Author: Francesco Di Tolla
Date: 16:42:14 09/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2001 at 17:16:04, Mig Greengard wrote: >And you all, of course... > >Looks like a completely unfair advantage for Kramnik to me. Answers, and further >questions, are welcome. I'll keep an eye here. > >http://www.kasparovchess.com/serve/templates/folders/show.asp?p_docID=17571&p_docLang=EN > >Mig I think that one of the most interesting questions is number 6 "6. Is it true that there are a number of amateur chess players, rated around 2100, who would be able to beat all top programs under similar conditions?" I guess that it would be better to ask: Is there any program that can easily beat any 2100 player well prepared in anticomputer chess? Well my bet is that only a few programs would survive this, and I guess the best candidates are still Rebel, Shredder, and Junior but not Fritz for sure. May be Tiger. I propose another question: is there any chess program that can stand a turing test via ics agains a team of GMs-chess programmers? And the anser is nost probably not. regards Franz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.