Author: Slater Wold
Date: 02:39:59 09/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2001 at 02:59:35, Gregor Overney wrote: >Although, Kramnik's level compares with Kasparov's level, deep fritz is much >worse than IBM's deep blue from 1997. This is nothing more than an interesting >game between a top GM vs. a smaller computer system (eight CPUs running at 900 >MHz?). But it cannot compare with the event from 97 in New York. > >Deep fritz will not win this match. It might draw a few games but I would be >surprised if deep fritz can win one game. > >According to http://www.chessbase.com/events/bahrain/sched1.htm, Kramnik gets >plenty of rest between games. Something, Kasparov could not enjoy in New York. > >Gregor Just about everyone in this forum knows Deep Fritz is going to get crushed. Everyone in this forum knows that Deep Fritz on 8x900mhz is _NOTHING_ compared to Deeper Blue. It's publicity. And that's all it is. The world will soon know the difference between "Chessbase" and "IBM". Slate
This page took 0.21 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.