Author: Slater Wold
Date: 02:39:59 09/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2001 at 02:59:35, Gregor Overney wrote: >Although, Kramnik's level compares with Kasparov's level, deep fritz is much >worse than IBM's deep blue from 1997. This is nothing more than an interesting >game between a top GM vs. a smaller computer system (eight CPUs running at 900 >MHz?). But it cannot compare with the event from 97 in New York. > >Deep fritz will not win this match. It might draw a few games but I would be >surprised if deep fritz can win one game. > >According to http://www.chessbase.com/events/bahrain/sched1.htm, Kramnik gets >plenty of rest between games. Something, Kasparov could not enjoy in New York. > >Gregor Just about everyone in this forum knows Deep Fritz is going to get crushed. Everyone in this forum knows that Deep Fritz on 8x900mhz is _NOTHING_ compared to Deeper Blue. It's publicity. And that's all it is. The world will soon know the difference between "Chessbase" and "IBM". Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.