Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 05:31:02 09/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2001 at 07:52:56, Alvaro Jose Povoa Cardoso wrote: >On September 07, 2001 at 06:36:13, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 07, 2001 at 05:39:59, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On September 07, 2001 at 02:59:35, Gregor Overney wrote: >>> >>>>Although, Kramnik's level compares with Kasparov's level, deep fritz is much >>>>worse than IBM's deep blue from 1997. This is nothing more than an interesting >>>>game between a top GM vs. a smaller computer system (eight CPUs running at 900 >>>>MHz?). But it cannot compare with the event from 97 in New York. >>>> >>>>Deep fritz will not win this match. It might draw a few games but I would be >>>>surprised if deep fritz can win one game. >>>> >>>>According to http://www.chessbase.com/events/bahrain/sched1.htm, Kramnik gets >>>>plenty of rest between games. Something, Kasparov could not enjoy in New York. >>>> >>>>Gregor >>> >>>Just about everyone in this forum knows Deep Fritz is going to get crushed. >> >>I am not sure that everybody in this forum knows it but I am almost sure that >>Deep Fritz is going to get crushed. >> >>My prediction after hearing that kramnik got the program is 100% for kramnik. >> >>>Everyone in this forum knows that Deep Fritz on 8x900mhz is _NOTHING_ compared >>>to Deeper Blue. >> >>Wrong. >> >>Not everybody knows that deep Fritz is nothing compared to Deeper blue. >> >>I do not know it,Amir Ban does not know it,Vincent dipeveen does not know it. >>I believe that a lot of other people also do not know it. >> >> >>> >>>It's publicity. And that's all it is. >>> >>>The world will soon know the difference between "Chessbase" and "IBM". >> >>I am not going to know it. >>The match is not played under similiar conditions so comparison is useless if >>Fritz does not win. >> >>If Deep Fritz wins then it means that Deep Fritz is better but if Deep Fritz is >>crushed it means nothing. >> > >Could you please explain this? >Is it because of the diferent conditions of the match? Well, I'm not Uri but... Due to the fact that Kramnik has the program in advance. A super-GM like Kramnik will easily find weaknesses to exploit during the match. He would probably win anyway but this is the main difference to his favour IMO. //Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.