Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Delivery of the 2x1.4Ghz..........

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 15:44:01 09/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 07, 2001 at 18:17:54, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>On September 07, 2001 at 17:54:10, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On September 07, 2001 at 17:51:25, Aaron Gordon wrote:
>>
>>>On September 07, 2001 at 16:19:09, Slater Wold wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 07, 2001 at 14:15:57, Slater Wold wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I received my AMD 2x1.4Ghz today.
>>>>>
>>>>>Vince and Michel..........the 1.4's are _NOT_ working.
>>>>>
>>>>>No screen, no beeps, nothing.  Sounds like a normal boot, but no screen.
>>>>>
>>>>>Please........don't post 1000 things for me to check, I've done this more than
>>>>>once.  :)
>>>>>
>>>>>One thing I am thinking first, is I have a _VERY_ strange case.  I think it's
>>>>>warped, as I have had more than 1 mobo not boot.
>>>>>
>>>>>I am going to my top-secret testing lab to get it tested 1,000,000 different
>>>>>ways.  When (and if) I get back, I will tell you what happened.  I might leave
>>>>>with a 2x1.4Ghz and come back with a 2x1.2Ghz.  :(
>>>>>
>>>>>Anyway, I'll keep everyone posted.............
>>>>>
>>>>>And I'll post the results as soon as I get some!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Slate
>>>>
>>>>With some testing in the lab.........everything is up and running.
>>>>
>>>>Installing Win2k Server now.  Vince had complained about the system running hot,
>>>>however with only an inlet and exhaust fan, and of course heatsinks and CPU
>>>>fans, both 1400mhz CPU's are running no more than 80 degrees so far.  I really
>>>>have not put a beating on them yet though.
>>>>
>>>>Next post will be benchmarks from Sandra, Crafty, and anything else I can dig
>>>>up.  :)
>>>>
>>>>Michel and Aaron, thanks.  You were correct.  The Ayhja's work great!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Slate
>>>
>>>80C? Dear god man :) With the money you have if I were you I would go with
>>>liquid cooling... or at the very least a Millennium Glaciator. Bring those
>>>babies under 50C, anything over isn't good.
>>
>>Surely he means degrees F, not C.
>>80 C would be close to simmering (literally).
>
>Actually the processors are designed to run up into the 90 degree celsius range
>without damage, over 95C though damage could occur. I was just assuming he was
>using celsius and 80F is unusually low for a tbird 1.4 (I usually assume full
>load temps). If you could please let me know what your full load temp is.
>BurnK7 will run your processor at it's maximum and produce as much heat as
>possible. You can get it here:
>
>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/overclockstuff/cpuburnin/burncpu.zip
>
>The source is there plus burnp6 (for intel cpu's) and other's.

Will do.  I will report the temps with the benchmarks.


Slate



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.