Author: Steve
Date: 23:47:49 09/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2001 at 05:39:59, Slater Wold wrote: >On September 07, 2001 at 02:59:35, Gregor Overney wrote: > >>Although, Kramnik's level compares with Kasparov's level, deep fritz is much >>worse than IBM's deep blue from 1997. This is nothing more than an interesting >>game between a top GM vs. a smaller computer system (eight CPUs running at 900 >>MHz?). But it cannot compare with the event from 97 in New York. >> >>Deep fritz will not win this match. It might draw a few games but I would be >>surprised if deep fritz can win one game. >> >>According to http://www.chessbase.com/events/bahrain/sched1.htm, Kramnik gets >>plenty of rest between games. Something, Kasparov could not enjoy in New York. >> >>Gregor > >Just about everyone in this forum knows Deep Fritz is going to get crushed. >Everyone in this forum knows that Deep Fritz on 8x900mhz is _NOTHING_ compared >to Deeper Blue. > >It's publicity. And that's all it is. > >The world will soon know the difference between "Chessbase" and "IBM". > > >Slate All very true. And I find it disturbing that Kramnik couldn't come up with anything more interesting than this pale "me-too" imitation of the Kasparov-Deep Blue match. Kasparov is a great showman, who blazed new paths and brought chess more publicity than anyone since Fischer. Kramnik has yet to demonstrate those capabilities.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.