Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 12:56:25 09/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
>No
>you only gave evaluation that no program could find and it is not exactly what I asked.
The original poster asked:
in other words i am looking for any positions
that my system will not choose deep blues next move. or does
not see deep blues next move as an equivelant eval.
This positions fits in _perfectly_.
>I asked for a *good* move from deeper blue games that no program can find and
>you have to convince me that the move is good.
How do I do that? By showing you a line where another comp agrees with
the judgement? Thats exactly what this position should NOT allow!
My own judgement? After c5 the bishop is stuck. so there ;)
>One way to convince me is if programs can find the move after a lot of hours and
>in this case I am going to believe that the move is probably good.
That would be interesting. From the comments in the earlier discussions
I gather the solution is on the order of 30 or more ply.
How long would that take with a normal chessprogram? A few months?
Perhaps if I ever get a crafty with SE working good I could try
to let it run on it for a week or so. I believe Bruce has done
stuff like this before?
Besides, why would I bother? I just dug this up as something a
normal program CANNOT find and DB/DT could.
--
GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.