Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 15:18:55 09/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
>Note that in order to save time you do not need to analyze the root position and >seeing the same score in the position one ply after the root position is enough. If you are comparing nowadays comps to DT you cannot because DT could not do this as it didn't know whether c5 was the best move or not. I need to know both score and time for solving this, and since it takes this long, you really don't want to do two searches. >If you remember the discussion there was an alternative to Cray blitz move in >the game few moves after the root position and the first step to convince me( >showing me that the alternative is losing) was not done. I'll take a look at it. (Bg5 or so, right?) A few moves can still mean you need a 24 ply search to see the loss. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.