Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:20:12 09/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2001 at 16:57:42, Peter Berger wrote: >A few lines and results ( AMD Athlon1333): > >8/7p/p3pk2/1p5P/3K1P2/1P6/P7/8 w - - 0 1 > >1.) Analysis by Crafty 18.10: > >Crafty does very well with finding the move but has problems with evaluation - >needs a little help from a friend. > >1.Ke4 b4 2.h6 a5 3.Kd4 Kf5 4.Ke3 e5 5.fxe5 Kxe5 6.Kd3 Kf4 7.Kd4 Kg5 8.Ke5 Kxh6 >9.Kf6 Kh5 10.Kf5 h6 11.Ke5 Kg4 > -+ (-1.60) Tiefe: 21/39 00:02:00 67029kN, tb=17866 >1.a4 Kf5 2.Ke3 b4 3.Kf3 a5 4.h6 e5 5.fxe5 Kxe5 6.Ke3 Kf5 7.Kd4 Kg5 8.Ke5 Kxh6 >9.Kf6 Kh5 10.Kf5 h6 11.Ke6 Kg6 > -+ (-1.54) Tiefe: 21/39 00:02:32 84182kN, tb=26548 >1.a4 Kf5 2.Ke3 b4 3.Kf3 a5 4.h6 e5 5.fxe5 Kxe5 6.Ke3 Kf5 7.Kd4 Kg5 8.Ke5 Kxh6 >9.Kf6 Kh5 10.Kf5 h6 11.Ke6 Kg6 12.Kd5 > -+ (-1.54) Tiefe: 22/46 00:03:06 97913kN, tb=36963 >1.a4 Kf5 2.Ke3 b4 3.a5 Kg4 4.h6 Kh5 5.Ke4 Kxh6 6.Ke5 Kg7 7.Kxe6 h5 8.Kf5 Kh6 >9.Ke4 Kg6 10.Kf3 Kf5 11.Ke3 h4 12.Kf3 > -+ (-1.57) Tiefe: 23/46 00:04:28 132424kN, tb=52438 >1.a4 Kf5 2.Ke3 b4 3.a5 Kg4 4.h6 Kh5 5.Ke4 Kxh6 6.Ke5 Kg7 7.Kxe6 h5 8.Kf5 Kh6 >9.Ke4 Kg6 10.Kf3 Kf5 11.Kg3 h4+ 12.Kxh4 Kxf4 13.Kh3 > -+ (-1.90) Tiefe: 24/48 00:06:58 198522kN, tb=81405 >1.a4 Kf5 2.Ke3 b4 3.a5 Kg4 4.h6 Kh5 5.Ke4 Kxh6 6.Ke5 Kg7 7.Kxe6 h5 8.Kf5 Kh6 >9.Ke4 Kg6 10.Kf3 Kf5 11.Kg3 h4+ 12.Kxh4 Kxf4 13.Kh3 > -+ (-1.50) Tiefe: 25/50 00:12:54 392895kN, tb=127302 > >1.a4 Kf5 2.Ke3 b4 3.a5 Kg4 > >4.h6 Kh5 5.Ke4 Kxh6 6.Ke5 Kg7 7.Kxe6 h5 8.Kf5 Kh6 9.Ke6 Kg7 > = (0.00) Tiefe: 20/32 00:00:05 3359kN, tb=259 >4.h6 Kh5 5.Ke4 Kxh6 6.Ke5 Kg7 7.Kxe6 h5 8.Kf5 Kh6 9.Ke6 Kg7 > = (0.00) Tiefe: 21/32 00:00:07 4157kN, tb=477 > >3... h6 > >4.Kf3 e5 5.fxe5 Kxe5 6.Ke3 Kd5 7.Kd3 Kc5 8.Ke4 Kb5 9.Kf5 Kxa5 10.Kg6 Kb5 11.Kxh6 >a5 12.Kg7 a4 13.bxa4+ > = (0.01) Tiefe: 25/40 00:00:08 4954kN, tb=1465 >4.Kf3 e5 5.fxe5 Kxe5 6.Ke3 Kd5 7.Kd3 Kc5 8.Ke4 Kb5 9.Kf5 Kxa5 10.Kg6 Kb5 11.Kxh6 >a5 12.Kg7 a4 13.bxa4+ > = (0.01) Tiefe: 26/43 00:00:15 7583kN, tb=3255 > >2...h6 > >3.Kf3 bxa4 4.bxa4 a5 5.Kg3 e5 6.fxe5 Kxe5 7.Kh3 Kf5 8.Kg3 Kg5 9.Kf3 Kxh5 > = (-0.01) Tiefe: 20/36 00:00:13 5672kN, tb=4316 >3.Kf3 bxa4 4.bxa4 a5 5.Kg3 e5 6.fxe5 Kxe5 7.Kh3 Kf5 8.Kg3 Kg5 9.Kf3 Kxh5 > = (-0.01) Tiefe: 21/36 00:00:17 6744kN, tb=5332 > >8/7p/p3pk2/1p5P/3K1P2/1P6/P7/8 w - - 0 1 > >2.) Analysis by Deep Fritz: > >Excellent! > >1.Ke4-- b4 2.h6 a5 3.Kd4 Kf5 4.Ke3 e5 5.fxe5 Kxe5 6.Ke2 > -+ (-2.37) Tiefe: 22/39 00:01:07 30452kN, tb=23000 >1.a4! > -+ (-2.34) Tiefe: 22/39 00:01:19 33616kN, tb=27732 >1.a4! Kf5 2.Ke3 h6 3.Kf3 bxa4 4.bxa4 a5 5.Ke3 e5 6.fxe5 Kxe5 > = (0.00) Tiefe: 22/39 00:01:25 36928kN, tb=30889 >1.a4 Kf5 2.Ke3 h6 3.Kf3 bxa4 4.bxa4 a5 5.Ke3 e5 6.fxe5 Kxe5 > = (0.00) Tiefe: 23/41 00:01:48 44786kN, tb=47146 > >1.a4 Kf5 2.Ke3 h6 3.Kf3 e5 > >4.axb5 axb5 5.fxe5 Kxe5 6.Ke3 b4 7.Kd3 Kd5 8.Ke3 Ke5 9.Kd3 Kd5 > = (0.00) Tiefe: 23/44 00:00:26 13396kN, tb=16824 > >3.) Analysis by Chess Tiger 14.0: > >The Misterious ! Tiger didn't show a fail-low on the losing Ke4, yet still comes >up with the good a4,too. Tiger probably saw a fail low for Ke4 but did not tell it. I guess it saw that Ke4 is bad and simply prefered not to waste time in finding a score for it and looked at other moves. It helped it to find a4 faster. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.