Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:26:57 09/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2001 at 18:18:55, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>Note that in order to save time you do not need to analyze the root position and >>seeing the same score in the position one ply after the root position is enough. > >If you are comparing nowadays comps to DT you cannot because >DT could not do this as it didn't know whether c5 was the best >move or not. The point here is finding if c5 really wins material. If it wins material and Deep thought found it then it is clearly better than today programs in that position and it is not important for me if it is 10000 times faster or 100000 times faster. I was not convinced that c5 really wins material. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.