Author: Claudio Duarte
Date: 16:37:21 09/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2001 at 18:38:34, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 08, 2001 at 18:27:48, Claudio Duarte wrote: > >>It seems that Hiarcs 7.32 ranks 12th in the last SSDF list. Is it still the best >>program in terms of positional style, or are there other programs with a better >>positional game? > >I read that hiarcs is more materialistic than Junior when Fritz is in the middle >between these two programs. > >I do not know what is the meaning of better positional style. >If the meaning is more realistic evaluation function then I do not think that >Hiarcs's evaluation is more realistic than Fritz's evaluation or Junior's >evaluation. > >Uri What I´m trying to find out is: From the current top chess programs, which of them could be considered the strongest in terms of usually building its victories based on the accumulation of a lot of small positional advantages - i.e. forcing weaknesses on the enemy position, such as holes, bad bishops,etc- to the point where tactical maneuvers become obvious? Regards, Claudio
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.