Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Corrected

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 01:16:26 09/09/01

On September 08, 2001 at 23:54:22, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>Does it actually win a piece?  I seem to recall Amir Ban investigating this
>position and posting that no piece can be won.  I assume he did a fairly
>thorough job of playing through various variations, i.e. I don't think he just
>set his program on infinite time and let it run.
>
>I don't have a CCC archive set up, maybe somebody else can find his comments.
>
>I am not saying that a piece cannot be won, I'm just not sure what the truth is.
> It would be helpful if we had the PV from the DT2 search.

Nobody (except DT) found the way to actually win a piece. That
doesn't mean there isn't any.

--
GCP

Re: Corrected Vincent Diepeveen 05:50:03 09/09/01
Re: Corrected Dave Gomboc 01:59:28 09/09/01
- Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 02:46:44 09/09/01
  - Re: Corrected Roy Eassa 14:41:52 09/09/01
    - Re: Some Fritz 6-assisted analysis of the game in question Roy Eassa 15:10:23 09/09/01
      - Re: Some Fritz 6-assisted analysis of the game in question Gian-Carlo Pascutto 16:25:46 09/09/01
      - Re: Some Fritz 6-assisted analysis of the game in question Gian-Carlo Pascutto 15:32:53 09/09/01
  - Re: Corrected Uri Blass 05:18:39 09/09/01
    - Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 05:48:40 09/09/01
      - Re: Corrected Dave Gomboc 10:06:20 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 11:45:52 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Roy Eassa 13:53:14 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Dave Gomboc 12:45:08 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Roy Eassa 13:53:56 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Dave Gomboc 15:30:17 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 16:01:48 09/09/01
        
        CB vs. DT2 analysis of 27...c5! and resulting eval Dave Gomboc 18:05:23 09/09/01
        
        Re: CB vs. DT2 analysis of 27...c5! and resulting eval Gian-Carlo Pascutto 03:37:57 09/10/01
        
        Re: CB vs. DT2 analysis of 27...c5! and resulting eval Uri Blass 04:56:31 09/10/01
        
        Re: CB vs. DT2 analysis of 27...c5! and resulting eval Uri Blass 11:41:09 09/10/01
        
        White improves with 36.Bxe5! Dave Gomboc 21:48:34 09/09/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 02:02:43 09/10/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Dave Gomboc 18:28:55 09/10/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 02:56:21 09/10/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Dave Gomboc 18:27:02 09/10/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 05:00:08 09/11/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Dave Gomboc 08:34:17 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 23:17:09 09/10/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Robert Hyatt 07:26:21 09/11/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Vincent Diepeveen 06:55:01 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 08:02:28 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Vincent Diepeveen 06:04:27 09/13/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 09:18:52 09/11/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Robert Hyatt 19:44:00 09/11/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 21:00:21 09/11/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Robert Hyatt 21:49:38 09/11/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 02:04:55 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Robert Hyatt 07:06:01 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 10:30:13 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Robert Hyatt 12:03:38 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 13:07:45 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Dann Corbit 14:04:13 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 14:57:42 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Dann Corbit 15:43:39 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Robert Hyatt 19:58:27 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 23:11:49 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Robert Hyatt 05:27:00 09/13/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 06:13:57 09/13/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 16:27:46 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Dann Corbit 16:32:23 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Uri Blass 22:52:51 09/12/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 04:24:18 09/10/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Dave Gomboc 18:24:01 09/10/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Robert Hyatt 07:29:53 09/11/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 05:12:38 09/11/01
        
        Re: White improves with 36.Bxe5! Bxe5!! 0 - 1 ;) Roy Eassa 09:06:20 09/10/01
        
        Re: Corrected Uri Blass 16:37:13 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 16:54:48 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Uri Blass 17:17:19 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 01:53:23 09/10/01
        
        Re: Corrected Uri Blass 02:31:18 09/10/01
        
        Re: Corrected Dave Gomboc 18:15:38 09/10/01
        
        Re: Corrected Uri Blass 23:26:58 09/10/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 04:58:06 09/11/01
        
        Re: Corrected Uri Blass 07:01:25 09/11/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 04:07:31 09/10/01
        
        Re: Corrected Jeremiah Penery 16:22:26 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 16:28:38 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Roy Eassa 16:21:13 09/09/01
      - Re: Corrected Uri Blass 06:50:28 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 07:29:47 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Uri Blass 07:34:33 09/09/01

This page took 0.04 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.