Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 10:26:42 09/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2001 at 08:45:40, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 09, 2001 at 08:27:50, Amir Ban wrote: > >>White can play better earlier, like 32.Bg5, and it's black advantage but not >>more. > >Uri pointed this out to me too and I gave him a line >after 32.Bg5 where black gains at least a pawn advantage. > >I'm sure it can be improved upon. The problem is that it's >hard to do so as the position is very hard. > >>All this has been pointed out before. What we are asked to believe here is not >>only that DT saw a (non-existent) combination no one else can find, but that so >>did Cray Blitz. > >The fact that the combination does not exist is your opinion and >nothing else. Just like your opinion about DB. You can keep denying >everything and claim nobody proved you wrong. > >Cray Blitz did not see the combination. I saw part of it, too late. > >-- >GCP Arguing with analysis is more productive. Perhaps it's possible that the +2.xx was actually based on positional factors? It sounds like Murray read the screen and made a casual comment. In that case, DT's idea of +2.xx might be equivalent to some other program's +1.xx. Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.