Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 12:59:58 09/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2001 at 15:56:48, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 09, 2001 at 15:34:20, Uri Blass wrote: > >>ahead is not winning and 3 plies are not 20 plies. >>20 plies difference does not make sense. > >You claim that SE doesn't matter at all in this position. I PROVE it >is AT LEAST 3 plies. Now you are claiming they can't matter enough. > >I can't keep refuting your bogus claims as fast as you can make them up. > >>Maybe we can solve the problem if hsu says that the +2 was result of a bug >>or of a big positional score than we can solve this problem. > >You forgot the correct option. > >-- >GCP Let's face it, the line you gave Uri doesn't come close to convincing that a substantial advantage exists for Black. Another possible explanation is that over the 10+ years since the game Bob's memory was inexact -- that DT2 failed high after Cray Blitz played 34. Nb2. Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.