Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Corrected

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 13:09:10 09/09/01

On September 09, 2001 at 15:59:58, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>Let's face it, the line you gave Uri doesn't come close to convincing that a
>substantial advantage exists for Black.

My complaint to Uri had nothing to do with that.

I was attacking his statements about SE in this
position.

>Another possible explanation is that
>over the 10+ years since the game Bob's memory was inexact -- that DT2 failed
>high after Cray Blitz played 34. Nb2.

That is true.

I don't think so.

--
GCP

Re: Corrected Uri Blass 14:17:50 09/09/01
- Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 14:28:38 09/09/01
  - Re: Corrected Uri Blass 15:11:51 09/09/01
    - Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 16:13:08 09/09/01
      - Re: Corrected Uri Blass 16:50:52 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 16:56:38 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Uri Blass 17:02:03 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 17:10:03 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Uri Blass 17:28:07 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 01:30:06 09/10/01
    - Re: Corrected Dave Gomboc 15:43:48 09/09/01
      - Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 16:08:13 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Dave Gomboc 18:17:08 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 01:32:55 09/10/01
      - Re: Corrected Uri Blass 16:02:44 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Dave Gomboc 18:20:52 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Uri Blass 23:31:25 09/09/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 01:35:08 09/10/01
        
        Re: Corrected Uri Blass 02:00:54 09/10/01
        
        Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 02:05:52 09/10/01
  - Re: Corrected Dave Gomboc 14:35:42 09/09/01

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.