Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Uri Blass(deep fritz) vs Robert Hyatt (IBM) - opinions or analys

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 14:33:21 09/09/01

Go up one level in this thread

On September 09, 2001 at 17:04:33, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>In other words, the is _no_ way this can ever be proved, correct?  Which does
>tend to make arguments futile...

Yes ;) That is my frustration.

At least 2 people here have said they wanted a position where DB
found something the current comps cannot find before they could
ever be conviced it was better than current comps.

If you find one, they are going to argue and argue that it's not
a valid one for God knows what reasons and that you need to find
another.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

--
GCP

• Re: Uri Blass(deep fritz) vs Robert Hyatt (IBM) - opinions or analys Dave Gomboc 14:46:53 09/09/01
  • Re: Uri Blass(deep fritz) vs Robert Hyatt (IBM) - opinions or analys Gian-Carlo Pascutto 15:02:05 09/09/01
    • Re: Uri Blass(deep fritz) vs Robert Hyatt (IBM) - opinions or analys Dave Gomboc 15:40:47 09/09/01
      • Re: Uri Blass(deep fritz) vs Robert Hyatt (IBM) - opinions or analys Gian-Carlo Pascutto 16:04:09 09/09/01
        • Re: Uri Blass(deep fritz) vs Robert Hyatt (IBM) - opinions or analys Robert Hyatt 07:05:22 09/10/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.