Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 15:02:05 09/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2001 at 17:46:53, Dave Gomboc wrote: >I don't think it is the case that Uri and I (or even Amir) are unwilling to >accept concrete analysis that demonstrates a large advantage. I never said you would. You would fall through pretty quickly if you did. The problem is that the concrete analysis can be huge enough that we'll never agree on all variants. >The Hiarcs >analysis you mentioned sounds interesting -- if it's coming up with +1.7 after >32.Bg5, that sounds quite promising for your viewpoint. Of course, I want to >see the variation! :-) I have another try with black that is at 1.46 now. I couldn't recontruct the lost line yet :( I'm trying to find the key moves and key ideas. I'll sum up what I get in a new thread. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.