Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 16:08:13 09/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2001 at 18:43:48, Dave Gomboc wrote: >Remember that while we call them "singular extensions", they actually did them >in cases which were not strictly singular. For instance, when there were only >three good moves, they extended all of them, though not to the same degree as >when there was only a single good move. Are you sure of this? I haven't heard of this before. What can happen is that it thinks a move is good, SE gets triggered and the SE shows the move is actually bad. It picks a new move who now also triggers SE, and also gets shown bad. This can go on for all moves. My implementation even has special code for this. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.