Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Corrected

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 16:50:52 09/09/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 09, 2001 at 19:13:08, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On September 09, 2001 at 18:11:51, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>>b) there is no need for a big difference. my implementation will
>>>   already extend on 0.25 pawns, or 0.50 pawns depending on the
>>>   situation.
>>
>>In most of the cases the difference is even smaller than 0.25
>
>In the lines I'm looking at, it's often a lot bigger actually.
>
>Remember SE are 'sticky'. If it thought a move was singularly
>better at one point it will keep extending it for a few more
>iterations after it no longer seems singular.

Yes but the number of singular plies in the same line is almost never 10 or 20
in that position and even if it is 20 in few lines it cannot ignore the rest of
the lines.


 Not seeing a
>0.25 pawn difference doesn't necessarily mean that it isn't
>singularly extended.
>
>>and if you extend
>>for a difference of 0.25 then a move that is 0.25 worse is not going to get
>>extended from the root and you are not going to see that it is losing 2 pawns.
>
>I don't understand?

I mean that if there are 2 lines when one has a score of 0.5 pawns for black and
another has a score of 0.8 pawns for black the line with 0.8 score is not going
to be extended so the position is going to get a score of at most 0.8 pawns for
black.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.