Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Corrected

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 18:20:52 09/09/01

Go up one level in this thread

On September 09, 2001 at 19:02:44, Uri Blass wrote:

>I thought that it is correct only about Deep blue.
>Do you say that it was also Deep thought?

I thought they did singular and dual extensions at least in the deep thought
era, but I do not remember this with 100% confidence.

>I also doubt if all these extensions were productive and it is possible that
>they believed that it should be productive at long time control and were simply
>wrong.
>
>I suspect that they had no time to test if these extensions really help relative
>to not doing it because they were too busy in implementing the new extensions in
>hardware.

I think they found the extensions to be productive.  Otherwise, they wouldn't
have used them for a decade.

>Uri

• Re: Corrected Uri Blass 23:31:25 09/09/01
  • Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 01:35:08 09/10/01
    • Re: Corrected Uri Blass 02:00:54 09/10/01
      • Re: Corrected Gian-Carlo Pascutto 02:05:52 09/10/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.