Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: do you know of any other deep blue moves that i can test

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 20:55:43 09/09/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 09, 2001 at 20:37:43, Slater Wold wrote:

>On September 09, 2001 at 19:59:46, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On September 09, 2001 at 19:44:59, Slater Wold wrote:
>>
>>>On September 09, 2001 at 19:26:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 09, 2001 at 16:18:36, K. Burcham wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>game 2  deep blue moves
>>>>>
>>>>>26. f4
>>>>>37. Be4
>>>>
>>>>Be4 is a bad move. 37.Qb6 is winning there because it goes to a won
>>>>opposite bishops endgame (if you toss pieces with black) which directly
>>>>explains why some programs want to make this move.
>>>
>>>Anand seems to disagree with you.  You can disagree with me all you want, but I
>>>think an arguement on the best chess move against Anand is going to be a short
>>>one.
>>
>>I know that I cannot trust analysis of GM's not because they are stupid but
>>because they usually do not spend a lot of time about their analysis and often
>>do not use computers to investigate if they are right or wrong.
>>
>>It is a fact that Peter leko is not very good in correspondence games based on
>>his ICCF rating and I believe that the main reason is simply the fact that
>>average players who waste a lot of time about their games are simply better than
>>super GM's who do not waste time about their corresondence games.
>>
>>Uri
>
>
>LOL - Geez.  No matter what I say............
>
>Someone here always has a reason why Deep Blue was wrong when Deep Fritz cannot
>find its move.....even when one of the top 3 GM's in the world agrees it's the
>best move, you still have a reason why it's not.
>
>Look at the commentary for the moves.  All GM's (and even Kaspy himself) who
>were at the game (and/or watching it) all agree Be4 is the move to make.
>
>
>Slate

I concur Slate!

Why Diepeeven still goes on about DB and Be4 etc. beats the hell out of me?

Now he'll reply and say I'm calling him an asshole again! ;o)


Mr. Diepeeven, I think you're an intelligent man, very good chess player and
programmer.

However, I don't understand your attitude about DB II or your opinion of
Kasparov, IE "He played like a child etc.?

Oh well, I'm sure you feel your opinion is the only one that's correct.

Terry



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.