Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:32:23 09/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2001 at 19:27:46, Uri Blass wrote: [snip] >I have no evidence for it except stories. >I could see nothing impressive in the moves of the games that suggest that >deeper blue was better than the top programs of today. No program has ever beaten the best player in the world in a 7 game match at 40/2 except Deep Blue (as far as I know). >My analysis suggests that their evaluation was slightly inferior than the top >programs of today. I doubt if the top programs of today could beat Kasparov in such a match. Maybe tactical analysis took a back seat to something else. >Based on analysis of positions their speed in tactics seems to be similiar to >Deep Fritz on good hardware(2-3 times faster than my PIII800). I suspect Deep Blue can play better. The upcoming Kramnik match should prove revealing in that respect. I think he is certainly Kasparov's equal.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.