Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 17:22:19 09/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 2001 at 18:44:00, Slater Wold wrote: >On September 15, 2001 at 16:39:26, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On September 15, 2001 at 02:51:59, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>W,S - Shredder 5.32 >>>5rk1/2p4p/2p4r/3P4/4p1b1/1Q2NqPp/PP3P1K/R4R2 b - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Shredder 5.32: >>> = (0.21) Depth: 13/26 00:03:21 98366kN >>>1...cxd5 2.Qxd5+ Be6 3.Qd1 Rhf6 4.a4 Qxd1 5.Nxd1 e3 6.Nxe3 Rxf2+ 7.Rxf2 Rxf2+ >>>8.Kh1 Re2 >>> = (0.15) Depth: 13/26 00:04:22 129368kN >>>1...cxd5 2.Qxd5+ Be6 3.Qd1 Rhf6 4.a4 Qxd1 5.Nxd1 e3 6.Nxe3 Rxf2+ 7.Rxf2 Rxf2+ >>>8.Kh1 Re2 >>> ² (0.33) Depth: 14/28 00:14:32 440035kN >>>1...Rhf6 2.dxc6+ Be6 3.Qb5 Rd8 4.Qg5+ Kh8 5.Qa5 Rd3 6.Kg1 h2+ 7.Kxh2 Rh6+ 8.Qh5 >>>Qxh5+ >>> ² (0.32) Depth: 14/28 00:40:41 1228777kN >>> >>>(W, 14.08.2001) >>> >>> >>>It upsets me a little that Shredder cannot find this mate. Even well over the >>>average time for a tournament move. >>> >>> >>>Slate >> >>Oh don't worry it's only forward pruning something somewhere. it might >>not miss it when it has white here. > >Yes, if you make the correct move, it takes less than 10 seconds to find it's >about to be mated. > >A little too late if you ask me. :) > > >Slate No not really. try it the move where white blundered in this game and you'll see it won't miss it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.