Author: Peter Berger
Date: 01:43:32 09/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 2001 at 19:20:02, Federico Corigliano wrote: It is possible but not very likely. Hiarcs 7.32 might be stronger against humans ( no test data availlable) or better for analyzing difficult positions ( you could compair results in testsets). If you are looking for the expected results in long autoplayer testmatches the SSDF list is a good source: 1 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2653 29 -28 647 64% 2551 14 Hiarcs 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2525 27 -27 679 56% 2482 22 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2478 18 -18 1473 53% 2455 25 Hiarcs 7.32 64MB P200 MMX 2473 23 -22 970 55% 2435 On a K6-2 450 MHz Deep Fritz is definitely stronger. On a P200 Hiarcs and the then latest Fritz were about even. My money would be on Fritz in any of these competitions on your computer ;-). pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.