Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:39:09 09/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2001 at 12:44:59, Werner Schuele wrote:
>Here is a nice win of PalmTiger 54MHz gambit style against Pocket ChessPartner
>beta 03 on ipaq 200 MHz:
>
>[Event "1 min per move"]
>[Site "*"]
>[Date "2001.09.16"]
>[Round "*"]
>[White "Pocket ChessPartner"]
>[Black "PalmTiger gambit 54Mhz"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>
>1. b3 e5 2. Bb2 Nc6 3. Nf3 e4 4. Nd4 Nxd4 5. Bxd4 d5 6. Nc3 c5 7. Be5 Qg5
>8. Bg3 a6 9. f3 Nf6 10. fxe4 d4 11. Nd5 Nxd5 12. exd5 Qxd5 13. a4 Bh3 14. Rg1
>Bg4
>15. h3 Bd6 16. Bxd6 Qxd6 17. g3 Bf5 18. Qb1 O-O 19. Qb2 b6 20. O-O-O Qc6
>21. Bg2 Be4 22. Bxe4 Qxe4 23. Rde1 Qf5 24. g4 Qg6 25. h4 Rae8 26. Rg2 Re4
>27. a5 bxa5 28. Reg1 Rb8 29. Qa2 Rb5 30. Kd1 Qe6 31. Qa1 Rf4 32. Kc1 c4 33. bxc4
>Qxc4
>34. Qa3 Rf6 35. Qe7 Rb8 36. d3 Qc3 37. Qxf6 gxf6 38. g5 Rc8 39. e4 dxe3ep
>40. gxf6+ Kh8 41. Kd1 Qa1+ 42. Ke2 Rxc2+ 43. Kxe3 Qe5+ 44. Kf3 Qxf6+ 45. Kg3
>Qd6+
>46. Kh3 Qxd3+ 47. Kh2 a4 48. Rxc2 Qxc2+ 49. Rg2 Qxg2+ 50. Kxg2 a3 51. Kg3 a2
>52. h5 a1Q 53. Kf2 *
Great but I would prefer that you do not use "time per move" time controls.
This level does not guarantee the total time spend by the program, so it does
not guarantee that the game is fair.
You should use "game in" time controls instead.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.