Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 13:15:32 09/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2001 at 00:36:22, Bruce Moreland wrote: >Vincent emailed me and asked me to run these. I ran them on a quad 450 Xeon. > >[D]8/p4bpk/7p/3rq3/3Npp2/PPQ3P1/3R1PKP/8 w - - 0 1 > >I get gxf4 until ply 10, after which there is a switch to b4, which is a bad >move. This fails low to -3.88 in ply 11, and gxf4 comes back with a score of >-2.48. > >Later in ply 11, f3 pops up with a score of -2.33. > >Up to here takes 89 seconds. > >f3 sticks until ply 14, at which point if fails low to -4.24, and gxf4 comes >back with a score of -3.21, resolving after about 1/2 hour. > >In ply 15, gxf4 fails low again, and the hour ended with no resolution. It was ><= -3.46. > >[D]8/p4bpk/7p/3rq3/3Npp2/PPQ2PP1/3R2KP/8 b - - 0 1 > >In this one, I have exf3+, with a score of +2.35 in ply 10. After 16 seconds, >in ply 10, it finds Bh5, failing high to +2.80. > >Ply 11 was uneventful, but in ply 12, Bh5 failed high to +4.24. > >The score creeps up slightly, and the last score I got in the hour was +4.99, >ply 15, after about 45 minutes. > >I'll run the first one again all night and see what happens. > >bruce thanks! It confirms already what i suspected. f3 is losing way harder than alternatives! I do not understand why ferret needs a ply more to get -4.24 for f3 than when after f3 is getting played. Possible to shine any light onto this?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.