Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 14:13:04 09/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2001 at 17:06:14, Christophe Theron wrote:
>On September 16, 2001 at 15:24:59, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>The recently published match result of 17.0-3.0 between TheKing 3.12 Utz10b vs
>>Shredder5 UCI played under ChessBase-GUI [40/40' on K6-2 533/32 MB hash] was
>>titled as sensational but a lot of people guessed there would something be
>>wrong. Although 95-98 % of the moves could be reproduced in the analysis mode
>>under the Shredder5-GUI the severe loss of Shredder5 seemed suspect. Mogens
>>Larsen assumed a problem with the WinBoard adapter used. And after all, I must
>>say he was right. I had played the match with the WB-adapter of 24th May 2001
>>and this one should never be used with Shredder5 under CB-GUI.
>>
>>I repeated the match, this time using the WB-adapter of 23th November 2000 and
>>obtained the following results:
>>
>>P3 650/32 MB hash: TheKing 3.12 Utz10b - Shredder5 [10.5-9.5] 40/40'
>>K6-2 533/32 MB HT: TheKing 3.12 Utz10b - Shredder5 [11.5-8.5] 40'40'
>>
>>These results look very realistic since Shredder5 does not feel comfortabel on
>>the slow hardware.
>
>
>
>A naive question: why don't you just assume that The King is stronger than
>Shredder instead of calling for some obscure reason related to time controls?
>
>
> Christophe
And I must add that it is already absolutely impossible to say which one is
stronger by just looking at this result.
So it is even more impossible to give the slightest beginning of any conclusion
about relative performance at different time controls.
Inversely, no assumed difference of relative performance at different time
controls is needed to justify the above result...
Christophe
>>Important conclusion: NEVER USE THE WB-ADAPTER OF 23TH MAY 2001 WHEN PLAYING
>>WITH SHREDDER5 UNDER THE CB-GUI.
>>
>>Regards
>>Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.