Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 21:17:12 09/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2001 at 17:35:42, Peter Berger wrote:
>On September 16, 2001 at 17:06:14, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>
>>A naive question: why don't you just assume that The King is stronger than
>>Shredder instead of calling for some obscure reason related to time controls?
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>>
>
>He used another ( probably somehow broken) adapter before and got a 17-3 result
>for TheKing. Now with a working adapter he gets more realistic results.
>
>He didn't suggest that either engine is any stronger I think.
>
>There is no reference to timecontrol at all - it's simply about some broken
>Chessbase WinBoard adapter ( and that one definitely really is quite broken ).
>
>Regards,
>pete
"These results look very realistic since Shredder5 does not feel comfortabel on
the slow hardware."
This is a direct reference to some hypothetic difference in performance
depending on the speed of the computer (which is the same as saying that the
programs perform differently depending on the time controls).
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.