Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 19:31:16 09/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 2001 at 17:39:17, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 17, 2001 at 13:06:09, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On September 17, 2001 at 03:45:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>DB didn't play a superb move here that is the bottom line. Some idiot >>>who can't play chess looked at the game and concluded that f3 is a superb >>>move because after a while several programs with bad king safety also >>>get it at the end. >> >>My program switched to f3 eventually. That was the point of the post that I >>made yesterday, after running the position for a long time, as *requested* by >>you. >> >>So now you tell me that my program has bad king safety? > >No. your programs score for f3 and the other move was very similar. > >What you see is that f3 is nearly -5.0, now for gxf4 you also get >the same. > >I wanted the -5.0 for f3 confirmed. That's all i needed, because >how easily it technical is i already know myself. > >If you are also not happy with gxf4, which leads to a very complex position, >then that's not interesting (unless it's like -mate in 10 or so). > >>I'm assuming that I'm misunderstanding something here, because I don't think you >>would be saying this. I would venture a guess that if you were to check out >>everyone's king safety, Ferret's would be pretty good. > >What i wanted to show and i think i'm succeeding here is that f3 is >DEFINITELY not the way to go! Well no, I don't think you are succeeding.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.