Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 14:29:54 09/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2001 at 17:02:51, Mark Young wrote: >On September 18, 2001 at 16:54:23, Steven Schwartz wrote: > >>Mark, >>The moderators create their own rules and regulations >>on these issues. Quite often they ask the outgoing >>moderators for information as it pertains to how they >>ran the show. >> >>Therefore, it is important that all members read the >>moderation philosophies and ask pertinent questions so >>that you can elect moderators that agree with your own >>philosophies. > >That is why I am asking this question after reading the moderation policies, I >needed to know if I should vote for a range of views to have a broad consensus, >or must I voted for only people I most agree with, or have my votes overriden by >one moderator that does not share the views of the other elected moderators. If the members elect moderators who are in opposition to each other, you will make things tough on them. One of the problems with our process is that the moderators who are elected might have contradictory attitudes about some very basic things. There is no "oficial" process in place to help them get past this if it happens -- they are on their own. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.