Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 14:46:12 09/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2001 at 17:20:48, Mark Young wrote: >What are your views on working with the other 2 elected moderators in forming a >consensus moderation policy that all 3 elected moderators will then follow? I thinks it's actually simple, there's two kinds of posts that (possibly) need moderation: a) obvious ones: flaming direct personal attacks, trolls, etc... I believe a moderator should just go ahead with it and delete such a post, if he feels sure enough it is ok to do so. This relieves the burden on other moderators and makes for quicker responses in urgent cases where they're hard to reach. Not much need for cooperation here. b) arguable ones. In such a case we can ask each others opinion and see if there's a concensus whether it warrants deletion or a warning in the forum. I would personally prefer a veto system here, i.e. if one moderator thinks it's ok then it's left at that, but if the other people feel another system is better I'm fine with it as long as it's reasonable. >Will you post the moderation policy (not for debate) but so ICC members know the >new moderation policy? If the other moderators agree to it and the members ask for it, why not? -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.