Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 14:52:16 09/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2001 at 17:20:48, Mark Young wrote: >What are your views on working with the other 2 elected moderators in forming a >consensus moderation policy that all 3 elected moderators will then follow? Maybe. I think this is up to the elected moderators IMHO. Anyway, from my part everything _could_ be negotiable and flexible with only one exception, if I see a post that belongs to this category: "Off topic messages with possible consequences for the group: It will be deleted immediately with no further explanations given. A very clear example could be a comments about a possible war or politics. This is an international group and we have to try to avoid heated explosive arguments" This is taken from my moderation policy. In the rest of the cases, there is always a warning so I do not see how that could be a big problem with the rest of the moderators. Anyway, I do not want to spend a lot of time discussing possible conflicts that will never happen. That comes from a chess program code :-) do not test legality because alpha-beta could eliminate that before. Time is valuable. Regards, Miguel > >Will you post the moderation policy (not for debate) but so ICC members know the >new moderation policy?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.