Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 14:53:16 09/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2001 at 17:48:28, Robert Hyatt wrote: >WAC is at least tactical, and I use it a lot because I can do the entire test >in a few minutes. And all I care about is "did I break something, or did I >make something a bit better/faster?" Positional test positions are harder to >come by... This one should be fully tactical too. It's 1/3 less positions than WAC so it runs faster. And the really neat thing: it shows much more response to changes. My recent set of changes brought my program from 272 to 279 on WAC, so thats 7 on 300 more. With this set I get from 69 to 80. Thats 11 more on 200 positions. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.