Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A proposed WAC replacement for testing

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 16:38:01 09/18/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 18, 2001 at 18:53:35, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>There are 201 positions in your set.
>
>I am going to run them with K=2 and look for cooks.
>
>I don't think it makes sense to test for 10 seconds, unless you are deliberately
>trying to test quick searches.
>
>On the other hand, 10 minutes is too long.  I can see why people would want to
>test for 10 minutes though, since this means that you're tuning for tournament
>times in a year or two.
>
>I compromise and test for a minute or so.

This file may or may not be helpful in the search:
ftp://cap.connx.com/pub/EPD/disagree.epd

There are 39 problems from that set for which the stated bm disagreed with
{ancient} analysis from the Apocalypse project.

I'm guessing that the cooks will split half/half with about 20 new solutions and
20 problems where the answer was simply missed.  Of course, that's only a wild
guess.

[snip]



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.