Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A proposed WAC replacement for testing

Author: Heiner Marxen

Date: 18:53:18 09/18/01

Go up one level in this thread

On September 18, 2001 at 13:05:08, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>I would appreciate feedback about the positions,
>especially if you think there is an incorrect
>or dual soltion. Performance data of other amateur
>or professional programs is appreciated too.
>My latest Sjeng gets 80/200 at 10s on an Athlon 1000.

Scanning for mates up to depth 6 Chest finds only one result:

>r3q2r/2p1k1p1/p5p1/1p2Nb2/1P2nB2/P7/2PNQbPP/R2R3K b - - bm Rxh2+; id "ECM.1387";

r3q2r/2p1k1p1/p5p1/1p2Nb2/1P2nB2/P7/2PNQbPP/R2R3K b - - acn 111735; acs 2; bm
Rxh2+; ce 32756; dm 6; id "ECM.1387"; pv Rxh2+ Bxh2 Ng3+ Bxg3 Qh8+ Bh2 Qxh2+
Kxh2 Rh8+ Qh5 Rxh5#;

I'll try with depth=7, also, and report any further results.

Cheers,
Heiner

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.