Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 11:11:42 09/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2001 at 23:12:44, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On September 18, 2001 at 13:13:58, Dan Andersson wrote: > >>I didn't say they cheated. I didn't say it was junk. I did not even imply it. >>Why do you insinuate some such thing. I only said that there are other radically >>different methods that may have even better performance. > >I didn't insinuate that you said they cheated. I was pointing out that they did >not chear (and insinuating that some other reporters of results cheated!). > >You said that "I have known of APHID for a long time. All I can say is. I'm not >impressed. There are way better work distribution algorithms.", which does >leave the impression of "junk" in mind, wouldn't you agree? > >Dave Gold is way better than silver, but I would not call silver junk. It's not even close.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.