Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A proposed WAC replacement for testing

Author: Miguel A. Ballicora

Date: 14:22:44 09/19/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 19, 2001 at 17:01:35, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On September 19, 2001 at 15:33:11, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote:
>
>>On September 19, 2001 at 10:18:23, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>>>r1b5/p2k1r1p/3P2pP/1ppR4/2P2p2/2P5/P1B4P/4R1K1 w - - bm Bxg6; id "ECM.1545"; crafty thinks cxb5 is much better.
>>>
>>>This is 'Beyen's Trick'. After Bxg6 hxg6 Re7+ Rxe7 dxe7 Kxe7 Td8 white wins, but
>>>cxb5 seems to
>>>be just as well. Eliminated.
>>
>> But please see:  http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/diary_4.htm
>
>I *KNOW* about it. That was why I said it was Beyens Trick.
>
>That does not mean it is objectively the best move.

I just saw the diagram and remembered the story. Beautiful combination!
Anyway, I fail to see why cxb5 is as good as Bxg6. The latter forces
a resignation in few moves...
cxb5 Bb7 and I do not see a crushing advantage.
I think that I would keep this position.

Regards,
Miguel


>
>--
>GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.