Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: GCP's new ECM (39 disagreeable positions pounded @2000 seconds...)

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 04:10:56 09/20/01

Go up one level in this thread

On September 19, 2001 at 18:05:43, Joshua Lee wrote:

>Nice try at a test set but i will let you know which ECM problems are not solved
>and you should use those. Some have errors  like ECM 390 ...i will post what i
>find in a few months

I expressly want problems that _can_ be solved with varying difficulty.

A testset isn't going to get help in debugging and regression testing
if you go from 0 solved to 0 solved.

The idea isn't to make something to compare programs on. Testsets
are useless for that. I wan't something to test improvements on.

--
GCP

• Re: GCP's new ECM (39 disagreeable positions pounded @2000 seconds...) Uri Blass 04:35:55 09/20/01
  • Re: GCP's new ECM (39 disagreeable positions pounded @2000 seconds...) Miguel A. Ballicora 09:56:59 09/20/01
  • Re: GCP's new ECM (39 disagreeable positions pounded @2000 seconds...) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 06:06:53 09/20/01
    • Re: GCP's new ECM (39 disagreeable positions pounded @2000 seconds...) Miguel A. Ballicora 06:33:22 09/20/01
      • Re: GCP's new ECM (39 disagreeable positions pounded @2000 seconds...) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 07:11:31 09/20/01
        • Re: GCP's new ECM (39 disagreeable positions pounded @2000 seconds...) Uri Blass 07:34:55 09/20/01
          • Re: GCP's new ECM (39 disagreeable positions pounded @2000 seconds...) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 07:49:45 09/20/01
      • Re: GCP's new ECM (39 disagreeable positions pounded @2000 seconds...) Uri Blass 07:07:07 09/20/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.