Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 04:49:29 09/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 20, 2001 at 15:42:33, J. Wesley Cleveland wrote: >>is f7 really better than Rxe8? > >They appear to be straight transpositions. > 16-> 44:24 3.63 1. f5 Qg5 2. Rxe8+ Bxe8 3. Bxg7+ Qxg7 > 4. f6 Qf8 5. Bxc6 Kg8 6. Bxb7 c6 7. > Bc8 Qh6 8. Be6+ Bf7 9. Bd7 c5 10. Kg2 > Qe3 11. Qc2 h6 > time=60:01 cpu=99% mat=0 n=835372901 fh=22% nps=231k > > 16-> 28:46 3.64 1. Rxe8+ Bxe8 2. f5 Qg5 3. Bxg7+ Qxg7 > 4. f6 Qf8 5. Bxc6 Bf7 6. Bxb7 Qe8 7. > Kf2 Qe6 8. Qd4 a5 9. g4 c5 10. Qf4 > h5 11. gxh5 Bxh5 > time=28:46 cpu=99% mat=0 n=331499134 fh=92% nps=192k I'm not so sure about that. White doesn't _have_ to exchange the rooks if he plays f7 first and not doing so is probably better because it adds force to the attack. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.