Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: COMPUTER CHESS LEAGUE (CCL) introduction

Author: Albert Silver

Date: 04:51:40 05/20/98

Go up one level in this thread


On May 20, 1998 at 03:10:38, Ed Schröder wrote:

>>Posted by Dave Gomboc on May 20, 1998 at 02:21:34:
>
>>>>Will the PGN format games have time and score stamps (e.g. how much time
>>>>has elapsed on the program's clock, and what score the program assigned
>>>>to the position) after each move?
>
>>>Skipped this because it will make the downloads bigger.
>
>>>- Ed -
>
>
>>>>Dave Gomboc
>
>>That's a bummer! :-)  I always find it the most interesting to check out
>>the places where the program have differing opinions, to follow the game
>>and see when the one that is wrong finally figures it out!
>
>>Maybe you could keep a version with the times and score stamps available
>>as well?  Many North Americans have reasonably quick connections.  For
>>instance, I pay a cable modem provider $CDN 40/month, and I get about
>>600kb/s to my home computer.  I don't do much waiting, and I'm sure
>>there are people with connections one heck of a lot faster than mine.
>
>Yes you are right, I will see what I can do.
>
>Proposal, CBF,CBH,DAT and PGN without the programs evaluation and then
>*one* format (say PGN) with the programs evaluations provided that
>enough programs have that option. Must check first if this is feasible.
>
>Comments?
>
>- Ed -
>
>

I'm all for it. Evals are definitely of interest as are the thinking
times (when and if you can include them). Just as it is interesting to
note when and where a Grandmaster chooses to go into a deep think, and
how much time was invested for that particular move, it is also
interesting to see the programs' choices.

                                    Albert Silver



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.