Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty analysis of WAC II at 3600 seconds (long post) + help request

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 05:43:15 09/23/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 22, 2001 at 12:44:33, Michel Langeveld wrote:

>It's maybe a good idea to keep the id numbers there. Because I use them a lot in
>my analysis. So this one is ECM.1622:
>
>>This was analyzed here and I'm quite sure Rxh2 is correct, but
>>the full win is deep and tricky.
>>
>>[D]2rq1rk1/pp1bnpbp/4p1p1/3pP1N1/3P2Q1/2PB4/P4PPP/R1B1R1K1 w - -
>>
>>Same here. Mainline (from memory) Nxh7 Kxh7 Qh5+ Kg8 Bxg6
>>
>>--
>>GCP
>
>The mainline is very good for white. Because Bxg6 is probably wrong. After that
>white will play Qh3. You mean probably:
>
>1. Nxh7 Kxh7 2. Qh4+ Kg8 3. Bg5 +-

Yes. I confused this position with another one.

--
GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.