Author: Michel Langeveld
Date: 10:34:59 09/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2001 at 07:27:02, Slater Wold wrote: >I gave it 30 minutes this time. I only had 30 minutes, because then I have to >go to work. This is what I got: > >PFGA: EPD record: 1 ID: ECM.1204 >middle-game phase > clearing hash tables > time surplus 0.00 time limit 30:00 (30:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) >starting thread 1 > (2) 7-> 0.19 -0.01 1. Nf3 Na5 2. Bd3 c4 3. Be4 b5 4. Ra1 > 8 0.23 0.04 1. Nf3 Na5 2. Bd3 c4 3. Be4 b5 4. Bxb7 > Qxb7 5. Ra1 > (3) 8-> 0.45 0.04 1. Nf3 Na5 2. Bd3 c4 3. Be4 b5 4. Bxb7 > Qxb7 5. Ra1 > (2) 9 0.66 -0.06 1. Nf3 Na5 2. Bd3 b5 3. axb5 c4 4. > Be4 Bxe4 5. Qxe4 axb5 > (3) 9-> 1.33 -0.06 1. Nf3 Na5 2. Bd3 b5 3. axb5 c4 4. > Be4 Bxe4 5. Qxe4 axb5 > (2) 10 2.14 -0.09 1. Nf3 g5 2. Bg3 h5 3. h4 g4 4. Ng5 > Na5 5. Bf4 Nxc4 6. Qxc4 > (2) 10-> 3.97 -0.09 1. Nf3 g5 2. Bg3 h5 3. h4 g4 4. Ng5 > Na5 5. Bf4 Nxc4 6. Qxc4 > 11 5.30 0.00 1. Nf3 g5 2. Bg3 Na5 3. Bd3 Qc6 4. > b3 c4 5. Bxc4 g4 6. Ne1 Nxc4 7. bxc4 > (3) 11-> 9.25 0.00 1. Nf3 g5 2. Bg3 Na5 3. Bd3 Qc6 4. > b3 c4 5. Bxc4 g4 6. Ne1 Nxc4 7. bxc4 > (2) 12 11.61 -0.17 1. Nf3 g5 2. Bg3 Na5 3. Bd3 h5 4. h4 > g4 5. Ne1 c4 6. Be4 Bxe4 7. Qxe4 > (4) 12-> 22.39 -0.17 1. Nf3 g5 2. Bg3 Na5 3. Bd3 h5 4. h4 > g4 5. Ne1 c4 6. Be4 Bxe4 7. Qxe4 > (3) 13 29.91 -0.16 1. Nf3 g5 2. Bg3 h5 3. Bd3 c4 4. Nxg5 > Bxg5 5. Qxh5 cxd3 6. Qxg5+ Kh7 7. Qh5+ > Kg7 8. Rxd3 > (4) 13-> 2:42 -0.16 1. Nf3 g5 2. Bg3 h5 3. Bd3 c4 4. Nxg5 > Bxg5 5. Qxh5 cxd3 6. Qxg5+ Kh7 7. Qh5+ > Kg7 8. Rxd3 > (3) 14 3:02 -0.12 1. Nf3 g5 2. Bg3 Na5 3. Bd3 Qc6 4. > b3 c4 5. Bxc4 Nxc4 6. Qxc4 Qxc4 7. > bxc4 Bc6 8. Rb1 Bxa4 9. Rxb6 > 14 4:02 0.13 1. Nxf7 Kxf7 2. Rxd7 Rxd7 3. Bxe6+ > Kxe6 4. Qc4+ Kf5 5. Qf7+ Bf6 6. Rxd7 > Nxe5 7. Qh5+ Kxf4 8. Rxc7 Bd5 9. a5 > bxa5 10. g3+ Ke4 11. Qe2+ Kf5 12. Rxc5 > (3) 14-> 4:21 0.13 1. Nxf7 Kxf7 2. Rxd7 Rxd7 3. Bxe6+ > Kxe6 4. Qc4+ Kf5 5. Qf7+ Bf6 6. Rxd7 > Nxe5 7. Qh5+ Kxf4 8. Rxc7 Bd5 9. a5 > bxa5 10. g3+ Ke4 11. Qe2+ Kf5 12. Rxc5 > (2) 15 5:33 0.13 1. Nxf7 Kxf7 2. Rxd7 Rxd7 3. Bxe6+ > Kxe6 4. Qc4+ Kf5 5. Qf7+ Bf6 6. Rxd7 > Nxe5 7. Qh5+ Kxf4 8. Rxc7 Bd5 9. a5 > bxa5 10. g3+ Ke4 11. Qe2+ Kf5 12. Rxc5 > (2) 15-> 7:18 0.13 1. Nxf7 Kxf7 2. Rxd7 Rxd7 3. Bxe6+ > Kxe6 4. Qc4+ Kf5 5. Qf7+ Bf6 6. Rxd7 > Nxe5 7. Qh5+ Kxf4 8. Rxc7 Bd5 9. a5 > bxa5 10. g3+ Ke4 11. Qe2+ Kf5 12. Rxc5 > 16 10:00 0.30 1. Nxf7 Kxf7 2. Rxd7 Rxd7 3. Bxe6+ > Kxe6 4. Qc4+ Kf5 5. Qf7+ Bf6 6. Rxd7 > Nxe5 7. Qh5+ Kxf4 8. Rxc7 Rb8 9. g3+ > Ke4 10. Qe2+ Kf5 11. f4 Nf3+ 12. Kf2 > Be4 13. Qxa6 > (2) 16-> 13:40 0.30 1. Nxf7 Kxf7 2. Rxd7 Rxd7 3. Bxe6+ > Kxe6 4. Qc4+ Kf5 5. Qf7+ Bf6 6. Rxd7 > Nxe5 7. Qh5+ Kxf4 8. Rxc7 Rb8 9. g3+ > Ke4 10. Qe2+ Kf5 11. f4 Nf3+ 12. Kf2 > Be4 13. Qxa6 > 17 15:13 ++ 1. Nxf7!! > time=30:01 cpu=201% mat=0 n=2554885089 fh=96% nps=1418k > ext-> chk=233433378 cap=4502331 pp=4945423 1rep=23274521 mate=8955 >74 > predicted=0 nodes=2554885089 evals=258587196 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > hashing-> trans/ref=32% pawn=99% used=-70% > SMP-> split=4156 stop=533 data=12/32 cpu=60:22 elap=30:01 >White(1): > >LOL! Sorry. I promise I will give it more time, and post the results here. > >Sorry! > > >Slate Anyway, I'm still interested in it. So if you are home then I'll be very happy if you can do it again. But Nxf7 looks very promising. According to a pervious post +3.91 Michel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.