Author: Michel Langeveld
Date: 14:30:02 09/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2001 at 13:47:44, Peter Berger wrote: >On September 24, 2001 at 13:32:52, Michel Langeveld wrote: > >>ECM 1621 >> >> r2q3r/2pkb1p1/p2p1n2/4p1p1/Pp2P1P1/1QP5/1P1P2PP/RNB2RK1 b - - 0 1 >> >>Is 1 .. Rxh2 really winning. >> >>I see a +2.38 after 1 .. Rxh2 2 Kxh2 ( 2 ... Qh8+ 3. Kg1 Nxg4 4 Rf7 Qh2 5 Kf1 >>Rh8 6 cxb4 Qh1+ 7 Ke2 Qxg2+ 8 Kd3 Rh3+ 9 Kc2) >> >>but wat after: >> >>1 .. Rxh2 2 Rxf6! >> >>for example: >> >>2 ... gxf6 3 Kxh2 Qh8+ 4 Kg1 Qh4 (-0.91) >> >>Michel > >Why take back here ? How about 2...Qh8 ? > >A sample line: 3.Qe6+ Kc6 4.Qd5+ Kb6 5.Rf7 Qh4 6.Kf1 Rh1+ 7.Ke2 Qg3 8.Rf3 Qxg2+ >9.Rf2 Qxg4 10.Kd3 Rb8 -+ > >This is not supposed to be an analysis but 2...Qh8 looks at least very >promising. Ok, but I think I can keep draw with 2 ... Qh8. 8 Rf3 is a horrible move. better seems to be: 8. d4 Re1+ 9. Kd2 Rh8 10. Kc2 Rxc1+ 11. Kb3 bxc3. I think black can keep a small advantage with Ed's variation
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.