Author: Slater Wold
Date: 17:34:29 09/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2001 at 20:03:01, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 24, 2001 at 19:56:15, Slater Wold wrote: > >>Deep Junior 7 - W,S >>r2qk2r/ppp1b1pp/2n1p3/3pP1n1/3P2b1/2PB1NN1/PP4PP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Deep Junior 7: >> >>1.a4 Nxf3+ 2.gxf3 >> = (0.11) Depth: 3 00:00:01 >>1.0-0 Nxf3+ 2.gxf3 >> ± (0.85) Depth: 3 00:00:01 1kN >>1.0-0 Nxf3+ 2.gxf3 >> ± (0.85) Depth: 3 00:00:01 1kN >>1.0-0 Nxf3+ 2.gxf3 >> ± (0.85) Depth: 3 00:00:01 1kN >>1.0-0 Nxf3+ 2.gxf3 >> ± (0.85) Depth: 3 00:00:01 1kN >>1.0-0 Nxf3+ 2.gxf3 >> ± (0.85) Depth: 3 00:00:01 1kN >>1.0-0 Nxf3+ 2.gxf3 Bh3 3.Rf2 0-0 >> ² (0.37) Depth: 6 00:00:01 5kN >>1.Bxg5 Bxg5 2.Qc2 Be3 3.Bxh7 >> ² (0.50) Depth: 6 00:00:01 16kN >>1.Bxg5! >> ± (0.80) Depth: 9 00:00:01 45kN >>1.Bxg5! Bxg5 2.Qc2 Bxf3 3.gxf3 Be3 4.Bxh7 Qg5 >> ± (0.82) Depth: 9 00:00:01 92kN >>1.Bxg5 Bxg5 2.h3 Bh4 3.hxg4 Bxg3+ 4.Ke2 Kf7 5.Bxh7 Rf8 6.Qf1 >> ± (0.82) Depth: 12 00:00:01 1248kN >>1.Bxg5 Bxg5 2.h3 Bh4 3.hxg4 Bxg3+ 4.Ke2 h6 5.Rh3 Bf4 6.Qf1 0-0 7.Bg6 a5 >> ± (0.82) Depth: 15 00:00:08 12743kN >>1.Bxg5 Bxg5 >> ² (0.52) Depth: 18 00:01:48 188951kN >>1.Nxg5 Bxd1 2.Nxe6 Qb8 3.Nxg7+ Kd8 4.Kxd1 b5 5.Bf5 b4 6.Ne6+ Kc8 7.Bd2 Qb6 8.Kc2 >> ² (0.68) Depth: 18 00:03:52 363925kN >>1.Nxg5 Bxd1 2.Nxe6 Qb8 3.Nxg7+ Kd8 4.Kxd1 b5 5.Bf5 b4 6.Kc2 a5 7.Ne6+ Kd7 8.Bh6 >>a4 9.cxb4 >> ± (0.72) Depth: 20 00:07:17 757031kN >> >>(W, 24.09.2001) >> >> >>And in 3:52! >> >>WOW. And I was just seeing if Chessbase programs could report over 2 billion >>nodes. :) >> >> >>Slate > >Deep Fritz can. >My experience is that most chessbase programs cannot and if I remmeber correctly >Junior7 or Tiger14 cannot report more than 4 billion nodes. > >Uri I got 3B+. Look at my response to yours in the Crafty posts. Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.