Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crap statement refuted about parallel speedup

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:49:02 09/24/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 24, 2001 at 21:49:52, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>
>So you say kind of here that it is NEVER possible in your viewpoint to
>get a 2.0 speedup when only measuring search times?
>
>Please give a clear statement here.
>
>Yes or No.
>
>


OK.  For an average case, which is made up of multiple positions, the answer is
"no" unconditionally.

For a single test case here and there, the answer is _obviously_ "yes".

_everybody_ has reported a >2 speedup for 2 cpus on a random position or two
out of a set.  This is expected since we are dealing with randomness in the
move ordering and random can sometimes be good, sometimes bad.

Look at my DTS numbers.  at least one > 2, several well below 2.

Average is a scientific-looking 1.9...

If you report >2.0 speedups consistently, you are simply going to get
laughed at over and over.  It is just not possible unless your serial
search is bad.  So either your results (parallel search) are bad, or
your serial search is bad.  In either case, "bad is bad".




This page took 0.06 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.