Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 11:01:12 09/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 2001 at 00:17:37, Albert Silver wrote: >On September 24, 2001 at 13:35:34, Antonio Dieguez wrote: > >>On September 24, 2001 at 11:52:04, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On September 24, 2001 at 05:48:59, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>> >>>>Wow, I nearly fell of my chair yesterday! >>>>He talked about Kramink's world title, and mentioned several >>>>times that Kramink should prove the legitimacy of his title, >>>>and that he is really the best player, either by playing >>>>(and winning!) tournaments or by playing Kasparov again. >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>Based on this, he stated that computer should not be considered >>>>superior to humans until the humans cannot win a _single_ game >>>>out of a match of 6, 8 or even 12 games. >>> >>>I wonder if he thinks that the definition of 'superiority' shifts when applied >>>to hummans as opposed to computers. >> >> >>of course. That's why he mentions computers stability or something. > >I guess that explains Kramnik's inferiority. That would just explain that Kramnik is not superior. I deduce that Kasparov had fatigue, was not concentrated and had personal problems :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.