Author: stuart taylor
Date: 16:44:26 09/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 2001 at 19:30:16, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 25, 2001 at 18:15:40, john c cook wrote: > >> junior 7 beat chess tiger 14 10 5 5 on two 1.4 ghz Amd >>but on my old 800mhz piii chess tiger 14 beat junior 7 8 5 3 >>all game at 40/2hr 144 meg hash for junior 192 meg hash for chess tiger >>on the piii i belive chess tiger 14 was the best it beat all my other prorgam >>at 40/2hr it look to me that junior 7 on a fast computer see more but i like >>the way chess tiger play chess has any one else come up the same way > >Sorry, but your conclusion does not follow from the data presented. >It might be true, but you certainly don't present convincing evidence. > >With a few hundred games, you might have a better argument. It's OK for him to say it anyway, because he ALSO gives the details from which we can understand whatever we want. I'm inclined to observe indications of things, even when there is no conclusive evidence yet. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.