Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Unbelieveable good move by Fritz5

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 10:48:16 05/21/98

Go up one level in this thread


On May 21, 1998 at 13:39:39, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On May 21, 1998 at 13:03:00, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>
>>On May 21, 1998 at 07:01:18, Georg Langrath wrote:
>>
>>>6k1/8/p3r2p/1p1pPpp1/1n1pP3/1Pq4P/PR4PB/3QN1K1 b
>>>
>>>This epd-file represents a position between Spassky-Tal 1959. Spassky
>>>took the rook 1…Dxb2, and who hadn’t. But this is wrong. Even if you
>>>play white with a weaker chessprogram against black with a stronger one,
>>>white wins after that move.. The best move is 1…dxe4. On the opposite,
>>>here a weaker black program always wins over a stronger black program
>>>after that move.
>>>
>>>I wrote about the position in PLY (SSDF) about eight years ago. Even the
>>>strongest chessprograms didn’t find the right move in those days. Not
>>>even in analyze for a week or so. Does you program find it? Rebel9 find
>>>it in analyze, but not in 3 minutes on my computer (Pentium 133).
>>>
>>>But Fritz 5 find the right move in about 10 seconds, and doesn’t change
>>>its mind then! Nearly unbelievable.
>>>
>>>I have tested Fritz5 on the selfgoing update, and now I have ordered it.
>>>Perhaps Chessbase shouldn’t be in a such hurry to put it away, when they
>>>found that it was possible to make it selfgoing. (You have to put two
>>>files to it from Cblight only).
>>>
>>>Not only I had buyed it after testing it, I think.
>>>
>>>Georg
>>
>>On a P200MMX:
>>
>>Fritz 5 finds dxe4 in 3 seconds (!!!).
>>Rebel 9, 185 seconds.
>>Junior 4.6, Hiarcs 6, Mchess 7.1, Nimzo98, Shredder 2, Genius 5 and CST
>>take over 5 minutes.
>>
>>Very nice position. Thanks.
>>
>>Enrique
>
>Chess Tiger 11.4, K5-100MHz, 16Mb hash, has a fail low on Qxb2 in 0.49s,
>and finds dxe4 in 0.71s.
>
>I let it run for several minutes and it never changed its mind.
>
>Just to have some fun, I then ran the position with Tiger running on my
>old 386sx 20MHz notebook (2Mb hash). It rejects Qxb2 in 18.78s (fail
>low), and would play dxe4 in 28.34s.
>
>So this position is maybe too easy for current programs.

Tiger's time is impressive, but take a look at most top programs...

One of my very favorite positions is the Badai problem I posted last
Summer:
8/1p6/p4p1p/2p1P2k/5P2/6pP/1P4P1/6K1 w - - 0 0

White to play 1.f5

How is Tiger doing with this one?

Enrique

>    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.