Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ECM.1527

Author: Simon Finn

Date: 03:42:32 09/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 26, 2001 at 05:09:07, Simon Finn wrote:

>On September 25, 2001 at 18:11:51, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:
>
>>On September 25, 2001 at 14:23:26, Simon Finn wrote:
>>
>>>On September 25, 2001 at 13:48:55, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 25, 2001 at 12:30:20, Simon Finn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On September 24, 2001 at 18:13:09, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On September 24, 2001 at 17:41:22, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Just to start a thread on this and post a diagram, Peter Berger
>>>>>>>thinks that Qh6 could be another solution.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[D]2r2rk1/pp2pp1p/2np2p1/q4P2/2PBP1b1/2N5/PP1Q2PP/R4RK1 w - - bm h3; id
>>>>>>>"ECM.1527";
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I've been thinking for ~10 minutes here in front of the screen and I do not
>>>>>>see how black can be saved after 1.b4.
>>>>>>1... Nxb4 2. Nd5 threats mate in e7 and the Knight in b4 that is pinned.
>>>>>>1... Qxb4 2. Qh6 f6 (Nxd4 3. Nd5 mate in e7 and queen in b4)
>>>>>
>>>>>After 2... Nxd4 3. Nd5 Qc5 where is the mate?
>>>>
>>>>Nowhere!
>>>>I did not mean mate in e7 in the second sentence. It was a "Lapsus"
>>>>after typing the first sentence. I meant mating attack (after taking in e7
>>>>and/or in combination with f6 or fxg6 etc.).
>>>>Anyway, it is not correct what I meant!. I did not see that Qc5 threats Nf5+!
>>>>
>>>>Still the position is very promising for White, I think, if you let me change
>>>>the PV. I will need to check thouroughly but
>>>>1.b4 Qxb4
>>>>2.Qh6 Nxd4
>>>>3.f6 (better than Nd5?) Ne6
>>>>4.Nd5 creates a lot of problems to black. After Qc5+
>>>>5. Kh1 the threat is fxe7 - Nf6+ and that looks good. A quick check with
>>>>Gaviota from this position seems to confirm this.
>>>
>>>Doe White have better than this?
>>>
>>>5 ... Kh8 6. fxe7 f5 7. exf8Q+ Nxf8
>>>
>>>Black is worse, but I wouldn't resign it.
>>
>>Actually, this position is resignable after 8.exf5
>>Black cannot play 8... Bxf5 because of 9.Rxf5 gxf5 10.Qf6+ and Ne7#
>
>OK - I resign that one!
>
>>If black cannot retake in f5 White is exchange up with an unstoppable
>>attack. 9.f6 is a serious threat and also fxg6 and Rf7. Feeding this position
>>to Gaviota I found this
>>
>>   2330313   8:     20.5    +5.20  e4xf5    Bg4-f3   Nd5-e7   Bf3xg2
>>                                   <-transp
>>   3651989   9      32.5      :-)  e4xf5
>>   3883252   9      34.5    +5.51  e4xf5    Bg4-f3   Rf1xf3   Qc5-d4
>>                                   Ra1-c1   Qd4-e5   f5-f6    Nf8-e6
>>                                   f6-f7    Qe5-g7   Qh6xg7   Kh8xg7
>>   4685131   9:     41.5    +5.51  e4xf5    Bg4-f3   Rf1xf3   Qc5-d4
>>                                   Ra1-c1   Qd4-e5   f5-f6    Nf8-e6
>>                                   f6-f7    Qe5-g7   Qh6xg7   Kh8xg7
>>   8828289  10      79.3      :-)  e4xf5
>>  15452000  10     136.5    +6.03  e4xf5    Qc5-d4   f5-f6    Nf8-e6
>>                                   Nd5-e7   Bg4-f5   Ne7xc8   Qd4-c5
>>                                   Nc8-e7   Bf5-d3   f6-f7
>>  20459370  10:    179.3    +6.03  e4xf5    Qc5-d4   f5-f6    Nf8-e6
>>                                   Nd5-e7   Bg4-f5   Ne7xc8   Qd4-c5
>>                                   Nc8-e7   Bf5-d3   f6-f7
>>
>>Black does not do better than a rook and exchange down.
>>
>>rewinding a little, rather than taking in f8 with the knight, if
>>7....Rxf8
>>8.Nf4 wins another piece. (or Re8/ Nxe6 Rxe6/ Qf8#)
>>To confirm it:
>>  11808844  10     104.0    +3.43  Nd5-f4   Rf8-f7   Nf4xe6   Qc5xc4
>>                                   Ne6-f4   Rf7-g7   Ra1-c1   Qc4-g8
>>                                   h2-h3    Bg4-h5   Nf4xh5   g6xh5
>>So Black end up with a rook down.
>>
>>We should look for alternatives earlier, but it doesn't look that there are
>>many.
>
>One last try (without a computer, so it may be rubbish!)
>
>1. b4 Qxb4 2. Qh6 Nxd4 3. f6 Ne6 4. Nd5 Qxc4 5. fxe7 Qd4+ 6. Kh1 Qg7

Yes - it's rubbish.

7. Nf6+ Kh8 8. exf8Q+ Rxf8 9. Nxg4

I can't see a good alternative either, so 1. b4 may well be a cook.

Simon



>
>Perhaps 3. Nd5 (retaining the option of Nxe7+ and Nxg6+) is better
>than 3. f6 after all?
>
>Simon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Miguel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.