Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ChessTiger better at faster time controls, Gambit better at slower..?

Author: Jouni Uski

Date: 04:05:59 09/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 26, 2001 at 06:50:07, Uri Blass wrote:

>On September 26, 2001 at 05:26:26, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On September 26, 2001 at 02:17:26, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>On September 25, 2001 at 19:30:10, stuart taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 25, 2001 at 18:15:40, john c cook wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> junior 7 beat chess tiger 14   10 5 5  on two 1.4 ghz Amd
>>>>>but on my old 800mhz piii  chess tiger 14 beat junior 7  8 5 3
>>>>>all game at 40/2hr  144 meg hash for junior  192 meg hash for chess tiger
>>>>>on the piii i belive chess tiger 14 was the best it beat all my other prorgam
>>>>>at 40/2hr it look to me that junior 7  on a fast computer see more but i like
>>>>>the way chess tiger play  chess has any one else come up the same way
>>>>
>>>>I think Gambit Tiger 2 is the program to try and beat. I think it is stronger
>>>>than Chess Tiger 14 overall, from results, and I would be interested to see if
>>>>you would find junior doing the the same to GT even on 1.4 Athlon hardware.
>>>>S.Taylor
>>>
>>>I have played hundred of games (40/40') with ChessTiger14 and GambitTiger2 but
>>>am still not sure which of these two programs is the stronger one. This
>>>conclusion refers to computer matches. Against some programs CT is doing very
>>>well and GT bad and sometimes the contrary happens.
>>>Regards
>>>Kurt
>>
>>
>>I have also been playing many games with Chess Tiger 14, and Gambit Tiger 2. I
>>am beginning to suspect that at long time controls on a PIII 1 GHz, and
>>somewhere between 1 and 3 min. a move Gambit Tiger 2 becomes the stronger
>>program.  This is the pattern I am beginning to see, but I need more games to
>>draw a firm conclusion.
>>
>>It seems that Gambit Tiger 2 gains more strength from long time controls then
>>any other program I have seen. This may have something to do with its playing
>>style, as its attacks seem to become more sound with increased think times.
>
>Do you mean that your data suggest that Gambittiger2 is stronger than Deep Fritz
>at long time controls?
>
>Uri

Wait until 1.10. and look at SSDF list!

Jouni



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.