Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New crap statement ?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 14:56:29 09/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 26, 2001 at 16:53:56, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:

>On September 26, 2001 at 16:32:26, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>
>>On September 26, 2001 at 16:20:25, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>But maybe Vincent has come up with a real stunner.
>>
>>We are all eagerly awaiting the proof that 1 + 1 > 2
>
>On the other hand, I do not see a proof that can't be.
>
>In theory... why not? with iterative deepening you have 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 < 8
>
>Regards,
>Miguel
>

That is not the same thing.  That is taking the very serial property of
alpha/beta and using it to advantage by iterating.  Parallel searching doesn't
assist a serial property, it works against it.



>>
>>--
>>GCP



This page took 0.05 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.